My noodle

A.

Within this article the author speaks on no only reading between the lines, but also writting between the lines as well.  With writting as you read you connect more fully with the book and it enters your “bloodstream.”  Through writting on margins or papers you are able to connect in a better way.

Golding places thinkers into three categories.   Love (the Venus de Milo) Nature (the leopard) and pure thought (Rodins thinker).  His head master placed them in certain order but he disagrees by the end of the essay.

B.

Dilapidated – Fallen into parial ruin or decay

Remoreselessly – Distress arising from a sense of guilt

Depravity – Corrupt or pervert

C.

I’snt reading about relaxing and getting lost rather than writting as you read more enjoyable?

What is an alternative if you dont own the book to connect through the “bloodstream?”

What in what order is it correct to place Golding’s “thinkers?”