My noodle

1. In paragraph 6, Csikszentmihalyi gives children a rather odd name, comparing them to something.  What is the name, and what does he mean by that?

2.  What technices does Csikszentmihalyi use to make his argument more clear in paragraphs 5-9?

3.  How does the use of latin words in paragraph 19 help his argument?

(Done in groups in class)

4.  In paragraph 3-4 he talks about positive practice mating and negative practice mating.  Why might it be more of an advantage to have both practices in a relationship v.s. just positive?

5.  In paragraph 9 he refers to a biologist.  What rhetorical move is this?